Of course, ChronoSync is clearly less hassle & expense if you don't already need to be running Win virtual machine all the time! If readers are interested in going beyond the 1 month free trial, a short term price break was recently announced: Kind of wish they'd sell just a manual version for less -) I don't mind the price, but it is 1 license per 1 mac. I haven't yet needed ChronoSync's sophisticated timing & triggers for syncing. Opening the "Analyze" panel gives better visual depiction of what source & target differences are and what is going to be changed where. Running a trial sync produces only limited visual info. ChronoSync is designed for such batch runs, although you can be more exploratory if you wish. Standard "production run" sync profiles can be created, named and saved. For me, Sync It! visually displays what I've asked it to do, and what actions it will take so clear and elegant fashion I have confidence I'm not making mistakes.Ģ) for standard cases where I dependably know I need a 1-way or whatever type sync, I will rely more on ChronoSync. I could set up rules for a bidirectional sync (in either Sync It! or ChronoSync) but these are hopefully rare, one-off situations and specifying/testing the rules is not worth the effort. Doing this by-hand with an elegant UI is easier for me. where I might have a screwy situation with latest updates on either source or target. This is especially useful in letting me break a big problem into parts and syncing smaller subsets of the overall fileset: e.g. Syncing can be very complex situations/needs vary so different solutions will apply to different folks.įor now I've somewhat inelegantly gone with 2 approaches:ġ) for situations where lots of interactivity, checking, diagnosing are required, I much prefer TotalCommander browser launching Sync It!. And human/operator error is typically the source of errors as you said: I've been using Linux and Mac a few years now, and still get it wrong sometimes. Not that command line options aren't fine, but we're looking for the most reliable procedure. Like OP MurrayE, I'd prefer a visual utility. Path Finder, at least, can display two folders in parallel columns but so far as I can tell, there's no way to get it to indicate what I ask in #3, above. Thus so far as I can tell, the following apps do not do what I'm asking about: Please note that I am not asking about comparing and showing the differences between two files. Obviously if a utility can list the contents of two folders next to one another, you could go through the two lists file-by-file. (b) which files are in both folders but are newer in the first folder than in the second folder, and vice versa? (a) which files in the first folder are not in the second, and vice versa indicate visually the differences between the two folders:.Preferably display, too, such other attributes as you select (kind, date modified, size).Display the list of files from two different folders, in parallel columns. Is there some Lion-compatible Finder-like utility that will do the following?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |